Search found 12163 matches
- 2010-02-17T17:56:55-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: convert to ADOBE rgb profile
- Replies: 12
- Views: 30124
Re: convert to ADOBE rgb profile
It probably means your version of mogrify can't read or write jpg files. Try: mogrify -list format It should have a ouple of lines like: JPEG* JPEG rw- Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format (62) JPG* JPEG rw- Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format What version are you running? (mogrify ...
- 2010-02-17T15:52:09-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: How to save the DIFFERENCES between two images ?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 93266
Re: How to save the DIFFERENCES between two images ?
When I run the convert command given by fmw42, I get a different image to image12diff.png on Google. (Personally, I'd put a +repage after the +trim. But that isn't relevant to transparency.) This is using an old IM: 6.4.5 Q16. The image I get has a transparent background, which I would expect. When ...
- 2010-02-17T08:40:49-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Building under Ubuntu
- Replies: 0
- Views: 4936
Building under Ubuntu
No questions; just some notes might might save someone some grief. I installed Linux 9.04 from the current version of ArtistX. Then I downloaded IM from ftp://ftp.imagemagick.org/pub/ImageMagick/ImageMagick.tar.gz, and compiled from source, as directed by http://www.imagemagick.org/script/install-so...
- 2010-02-17T08:07:54-07:00
- Forum: MagickStudio
- Topic: DIFFICULTY USING "EFFECTS/MOTION BLUR"
- Replies: 19
- Views: 70728
Re: DIFFICULTY USING "EFFECTS/MOTION BLUR"
Can you post the exact commands you used? Then we can try to reproduce the problem. What version of IM do you use?
- 2010-02-16T23:01:02-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: help with script bg_removal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16673
Re: help with script bg_removal
About the best I can get with bg_removal is: ./bg_removal img_0092.jpg 'RGB(37,188,111)' 18 19 img_0002_C.jpg These parameters cut slightly into the sock and fur, and leaves a little of the green surround. You can tweak the "18" to adjust your compromise. I got the colour by using Gimp to ...
- 2010-02-16T21:43:00-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: help with script bg_removal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16673
Re: help with script bg_removal
I would certainly use an image closer to what the camera photographed (not shrunk, etc). Method 1: Simply and crudely turn the green white: convert img_0092.jpg -fx "hue<0.25||hue>0.50?u:white" img_0092_a.png This gives jaggies, and we have lost the white sock and fur, which have picked up...
- 2010-02-16T18:20:51-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: How to save the DIFFERENCES between two images ?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 93266
Re: How to save the DIFFERENCES between two images ?
The links don't work. Perhaps you didn't tell GoogleDocs that anyone could have access.
- 2010-02-16T15:30:49-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: convert to ADOBE rgb profile
- Replies: 12
- Views: 30124
Re: convert to ADOBE rgb profile
Try using the full path of your downloaded profile: /my_downloads/adobeRGB1998.icc or whatever.
- 2010-02-16T15:24:04-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: How to save the DIFFERENCES between two images ?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 93266
Re: How to save the DIFFERENCES between two images ?
Can you post links to image1.png and image2.png?
- 2010-02-16T15:14:55-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Auto-detect optimal image output format, How to
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11918
Re: Auto-detect optimal image output format, How to
I suggest that subjective "quality" is hard to determine in software, including ImageMagick.
You might find that creating both PNG and JPG versions, with suitable "-quality" settings, then choosing the smallest of the two, gets you somewhere near.
You might find that creating both PNG and JPG versions, with suitable "-quality" settings, then choosing the smallest of the two, gets you somewhere near.
- 2010-02-16T15:04:56-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: help with script bg_removal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16673
Re: help with script bg_removal
Perhaps the script needs some work. Can you post it?
- 2010-02-16T15:02:05-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: FPDF error: Alpha channel not supported
- Replies: 11
- Views: 40636
Re: FPDF error: Alpha channel not supported
Have you tried fmw42's suggestion of removing transparency?
convert rounded_corners.png -background white -flatten rounded_corners.png
convert rounded_corners.png -background white -flatten rounded_corners.png
- 2010-02-16T10:08:24-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Dealing with alpha layers in TIFF->JPEG conversions
- Replies: 12
- Views: 33497
Re: Dealing with alpha layers in TIFF->JPEG conversions
I don't know the answers, but: (a) The Ubuntu file manager (Nautilus) seems to give the behaviour you want (b) So does Gimp, although opening mask.tif gives the warning: "TIFF image Message. alpha channel type not defined for file mask.tif. Assuming alpha is not premultiplied." So I assume...
- 2010-02-15T15:41:45-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: FPDF error: Alpha channel not supported
- Replies: 11
- Views: 40636
Re: FPDF error: Alpha channel not supported
Is it trying to tell you alpha channels aren't supported in PDF?
When test.png has transparency:
works for me, but test2.png has no transparency.
(Ubuntu, IM is 6.4.5 2009-06-04 Q16)
When test.png has transparency:
Code: Select all
convert test.png test.pdf
convert test.pdf test2.png
(Ubuntu, IM is 6.4.5 2009-06-04 Q16)
- 2010-02-15T15:25:52-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Convert CMYK PDF to JPG creates corrupt image.
- Replies: 10
- Views: 26125
Re: Convert CMYK PDF to JPG creates corrupt image.
Put it on a website somewhere and post the URL here.