Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

Dear all,
Can someone comment on this post? I'm still puzzled at the how steep the learning curve is. At this rate, trying to use Magick++ is almost futile, even though I have a strong background both in image processing and in C++ programming.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=23915

I'm also having a lot of inconsistencies between how something works on command line (usually perfect) and how it work from C++.
For instance, can someone post a C++ code able to erode an image? Just that.
Thanks in advance.

The 'morphology' method is not yet available in Magick++. I am going to add some 'missing' methods to Magick++. I will make sure to also include this method.

dlemstra wrote:The 'morphology' method is not yet available in Magick++. I am going to add some 'missing' methods to Magick++. I will make sure to also include this method.

Thanks for the answer. This means that these methods are empty shells at the moment?
Best,
Juan

Which 'empty' methods are you talking about? You can access the 'ansi c' methods with the namespace MagickCore. Those are the methods that are used by the command line. I will add a morphology method to the Image class of Magick++ that uses the MagickCore method(s).